Did India escape impact of
global slump? No, its poor grew by 34 mn
2.1% Decline In GDP Led To
2.8% Rise In Poverty
It’s a myth that the global
financial crisis left India virtually unscathed. In fact, India
is the biggest victim of
the
slump-induced poverty, according to data obtained by TOI from
the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA).
Check out these figures.
The UNDESA data estimates that the number of India’s poor
was 33.6 million higher in 2009 than would have been the case if
the growth rates of the years from 2004 to 2007 had been
maintained. In 2009 alone, an estimated 13.6 million more people
in India became poor or remained in poverty than would have been
the case at 2008 growth rates.
In other words, while a dip from the 8.8% growth in GDP
averaged from 2004-05 to 2006-07 to the 6.7% estimated for
2008-09 may be nothing like the recession faced by the West, its
human consequences for India were probably worse. The 2.1%
decline in India’s GDP growth rate has effectively translated
into a 2.8% increase in the incidence of poverty.
According
to the UNDESA’s World Economic Situation and Prospects 2010, 47
million more people became poor or remained in poverty globally
in 2009 than would have been the case at 2008 growth rates, and
84 million more would have been poor at the 2004-07 growth
rates. Of these, 19 and 40 million are in south Asia.
While the report did not give India-specific figures, these
were given to TOI by the UNDESA in response to a request for
more information on the numbers pertaining to the country. The
numbers come from revised per capita income estimates for 2009.
The report uses the World Bank’s definition of poverty, which is
people living on less than $1.25 per day in 2005 Purchasing
Power Parity (PPP) dollars.
The estimates assume that there has been no change in income
distribution. If inequality grew in India in 2009, the number of
poor would be even higher than these projections. HITTING
HOME
In 2009, 13.6 m more people in India became poor or remained
in poverty than would have been the case at 2008 growth rates
2.1% dip in India’s GDP growth rate (from
8.8% for ’04-05 to
’06-07 to 6.7% in 2008) meant 2.8% increase in incidence of
poverty Globally, 84 m more people became or remained poor than
would have been the case at 2004-2007 growth rates Jobs linked
to exports hit hardest in India
The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA)
attributes the increase in poverty to a combination of reduced
household incomes, rising unemployment and pressure on public
services. Job losses in India were primarily in export-oriented
industries like textiles while employment levels in Indian firms
catering to the domestic market were largely unaffected, the
report says. Monetary and fiscal policy intervention gave Indian
growth some resilience, while safety nets like India’s National
Rural Employment Guarantee Act (NREGA) helped to mitigate the
effects of the slowdown, the report adds.
“Surveys conducted by the labour bureau did show big job
losses through most of 2008, but a pick-up by mid-2009,’’ said
economist and Planning Commission member Abhijit Sen, adding the
caveat that the construction industry, which was hit badly by
the recession and is now recovering, was not covered by those
surveys. “It’s true that there has not been anything special for
labour in government policy except the general fiscal
stimulus,’’ added Sen.
In addition to job losses, food price inflation is a major
factor in a decline in poverty reduction in India, said Sen. “It
is not yet clear to what extent the spike in food prices is
linked to the global financial situation, the poor monsoon or
other factors,’’ he added.
The report is clear that the situation is picking up, but
celebrations would be premature—”global economic recovery is
expected to remain sluggish, employment prospects will remain
bleak’’. Job creation will lag output growth and as social
protection coverage is limited, working poverty levels will rise
and be difficult to reverse, the report warns. It is too early
for fiscal stimuli to be withdrawn, the report adds.
How many poor people in India?
There is no agreement yet on the number of poor people in
India. The last official (National Sample Survey) household
expenditure figures are for 2004-5 and the next round (2009-10)
is yet to be completed. Further, the definition of poverty
remains disputed, the Suresh Tendulkar committee’s
recommendation that India move away from calorific norms being
the latest iteration. This committee pegged the number of poor
in India at 408 million in 2005.
|