Why planting trees increases global warming
AFP
WASHINGTON: Planting new trees in snow-covered northern regions may actually
contribute to global warming as they have the counter-effect of tropical
forests, according to a study.
While rainforests help cool the planet by absorbing carbon dioxide and producing
clouds that reflect sunlight, the dark canopy of Canadian, Scandinavian and
Siberian forests catches sunrays that would be reflected back to space by the
snow, the study said.
The study, published Monday in the online edition of the Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences, found that reforestation projects in the tropics
would help mitigate global warming, but such projects would be
“counterproductive” in high latitudes. In mid-latitude locations like the United
States and most of Europe, more trees would only create marginal benefits for
climate change, the researchers said.
“Our study shows that only tropical rainforests are strongly beneficial in
helping slow down global warming,” Govindasamy Bala, who led the research, said.
“It is a win-win situation in the tropics because trees in the tropics, in
addition to absorbing carbon dioxide, promote convective clouds that help to
cool the planet,” he said.
“In other locations, the warming from the albedo effect (sunlight absorption)
either cancels or exceeds the net cooling from the other two effects,” said Bala,
an atmospheric scientist at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.
Researchers used a computer simulation to study the effects of large-scale
deforestation and look at the effects of tree cover at different latitudes.
“When it comes to rehabilitating forests to fight global warming, carbon dioxide
might be only half of the story; we also have to account for whether they help
to reflect sunlight by producing clouds, or help to absorb it by shading snowy
tundra,” said study co-author Ken Caldeira of Carnegie Institution. By 2100,
forests in temperate and northern countries will make some places 10 degrees
Fahrenheit warmer that if the trees had not been there, the study said. However,
the authors did not endorse slashing down boreal forests as a measure against
global warming.
“Preservation of ecosystems is a main goal of preventing global warming, and the
destruction of ecosystems to prevent global warming would be a counterproductive
strategy. In planning responses to global challenges, it is important to pursue
broad goals and avoid narrow criteria,” he said.
* Source: Daily News and Analysis, dated - Tuesday, April 10, 2007. *