Published in IIPS Mumbai, ENVIS center, Volume 3, No. 1, March 2006

 

An Apprehensions from Residents In Delhi:

Increasing Levels Of Noise Pollution

                        By P.Lal,Manju Rahi,Pragya Sharma,G.K.Ingle

 

INTRODUCTION

Sound is caused by vibration of substances, which may be in solid, liquid or gas. The substances, which produce sound, are called generators or sound sources. Noise is considered as any unwanted or undesired feeling of sound that may adversely affect the health and well being of individuals or population. It is the wrong sound, in the wrong place, at the wrong time (CPCB, 2001) . Most of the machines that have been developed for industrial purpose, for high- speed transportation or to make life more enjoyable, by furnishing additional comfort, reducing the drudgery of life, and speeding up our daily routines, are accompanied by noise.

                    Noise prevention and control is important as noise affects us in hearing, ability to communicate and behavior. Lesser noise can make the environment friendlier and life more pleasant(CPCB, June 2001).Central Pollution Board Survey reveals that in Delhi the ambient noise level has been observed to be ranging from 69-78 dB in different zones during 1999 in a survey done by CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board), New Delhi. Even in hospitals considered as "Silence Zones", ambient noise level was observed to be of 67dB (CPCB, Jan 2001). These levels could create problem not  only to the patients but also to the general public. With this background, present study has been conducted with the objectives to find out

(1)      Perception of general population about problem of noise pollution and their knowledge regarding its sources.

(2)      The harmful effects caused by noise pollution on human health and possible solutions to curb the menace.

 

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

The present study was a cross-sectional survey conducted in five zones of Delhi .A total of 150 subjects including 30 people from each of the

five zones namely East, West, South, North and Central regions were contacted. To select  a

 

candidate, first a school/Hospital (since these places are more likely to be disturbed due to noise) was identified and then 30 people in each direction within a range of one km were contacted at random. In case of no response, another subject from next house was interviewed. The participants were interviewed on a semi structured pretested proforma after taking their verbal consent .The proforma contained open ended questions related to demographic details, whether they felt noise is a problem, sources and reasons of increasing noise pollution in the city and suggestions to alleviate the problem of noise pollution. The data was analyzed using Epi info version 6.04.

 

RESULTS:

         

  Out of 150 people contacted, 14 refused to participate and 136 (90.7%) perceived noise as a problem. More than half of the respondents were males (53%). Majority  (44.8%) of them belongs to 31-45 years of age group. (Table 1)

 

Table 1: Age and Sex wise distribution of study subjects

Age (Yrs)

Sex

Total

 

Male n=72

Female n=64

n=136

18-30

21(43.8)

27(56.2)

48(35.2)

31-45

33(54.1)

28(45.9)

61(44.8)

46-60

09(60.0)

06(40.0)

15(11.1)

>60

07(58.3)

05(41.7)

12(8.9)

Note: Figures in parentheses denotes percentages

 

Traffic as a source of noise pollution was conceded by 70.5% of responses, loud speakers (63%), generators (52.9%) and factories (36%) were some of the other sources cited. No police action or penal measure taken against the deterrent was thought to be the major reason (52.2%) for increasing noise pollution. No respect for rules and regulations by the people (44%) and problem of increasing population (7.3%) were other reasons. (Table 2)

 

 

 

 * Associate Professor,**Senior Resident,*** Prof. & Head,Maulana Azad Medical College,New Delhi - -2

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2: Sources and Reasons of Noise Pollution narrated by study subjects 

Questions

Sex

Total

 

Male

 N=72

Female

N=64

N=136

Noise is a problem-Yes

72(96)

64(85.3)

136(90.7)

Noise exceeding limits

68(94.4)

39(60.9)

107(78.6)

Sources of noise pollution:

i) Traffic(pressure horn)

62(86.1)

34(53.1)

96(70.5)

ii) Loud Speaker

    -religious        

    -political

42(58.3)

09(12.5)

27(42.2)

08(12.5)

69(50.7)

17(12.5)

iii) Factories

30(41.6)

19(29.7)

49(36.1)

iv)Generators

47 (65.2)

25(39.1)

72(52.9)

v)Miscellaneous

9(12.5)

5(7.8)

14(10.3)

Reasons for increasing noise:

i)People follow no rule/regul./warning/request

33(45.8)

27(42.2)

60(44.1)

ii)No police action

45(62.5)

26(40.6)

71(52.2)

iii)Increasing population

7(9.7)

3(4.6)

10(7.3)

 

Note: Figures in parentheses denotes percentages

 

 Numerous harmful effects to the health were enumerated by the study population in Delhi such as  sleep disturbance, physical and mental tension etc. Noise pollution disturbs sleep and affects students (83%), a cause of disease/accidents (53.6%), a cause of physical and mental tension and social unrest (55.8%) and it creates difficulty in communication (41.2%).

           

Table 3 :Harm Caused by Noise Pollution and Suggestions of the study subjects

Questions

Sex

Total

 

Male

 N=72

Female

N=64

N=136

Harm Caused by Noise Pollution:

i) Distrub Students/Sick/Sleep

66(91.6)

47(73.4)

113(83.0)

ii)Physical and Mental Tension and fighting among People

39(54.2)

37(57.8)

76(55.8)

iii) Difficult to hear and talk

41(56.9)

15(23.4)

56(41.2)

iv) Injurious to Health and  may cause Accident/Disease e.g. HT

49(68.1)

24(37.5)

73(53.6)

Suggestions to Decrease Noise:

i) Better Implementation of Laws

63(87.5)

40(62.5)

103(75.7)

ii) Ban on Loud Speakers

71(98.6)

28(43.7)

99(72.8)

iii) Relocate Factories and Regular Electric Supply

62(86.1)

34(53.1)

96(70.5)

iv) IEC for Priest/Police/Politician

46(63.8)

23(35.9)

69(50.7)

 

 

To curb the menace of increasing noise pollution, law can be implemented more stringently highest percent respondents whereas 72.8 responses were in favor of ban on loud speakers and 70.5% wanted  relocation of factories. Intervention like IEC dissemination by local priest or politician can help mitigate the problem according to 50.7% of responses. (Table 3).  

 

 

 

 

 

Note: Figures in parentheses denotes percentages

 

DISCUSSION:

Inspite of many rules and regulations in place, noise levels in Delhi have increased over the years .

Majority of the study subjects contacted, perceived that noise is a problem (90.7%) is really an issue for consideration for the civic authorities responsible for maintaining civilian life.

             Traffic was considered major source of noise pollution by the study subjects in the present study which has been corroborated by other studies also (CPCB, Dec 1996, Khan, A.B. (1998)).No action by the police was thought to be major reason for increasing noise pollution, this is inspite of section 290 and 291 of Indian Penal code dealing with punishment for public nuisance (Table 2). Ambiguity in the definition of nuisance may be the reason for police inaction, which needs to be renewed. 

Noise is a cause of sleep disturbance and physical and mental tension as perceived by the study subjects in the present study has been agreed upon by other studies as well and showed that people who were exposed to high levels of noise complained of headache, irritation, hearing loss, fatigue etc(Khan, A.B.(1998); Bhattacharya,S.K. etal (1985))                   To decrease the level of noise pollution in the city, majority of respondents thought that strict implementation of law can help. Indian penal code, section 290 and 291 deal with punishment for public nuisance. Magistrate has power to order removal of nuisance caused by a person under Criminal Procedure Code (CPCB, 1996).

                  A large proportion (72.8% Table 3) of participants favored the banning the use of loudspeakers at public places. According to noise pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules 2000, a loud speaker or public address system can only be used after obtaining a written permission from the authorities. Also it shall not be used at night i.e. between 10 and 6 p.m  Awareness at community level and involvement of people in influential places to motivate the masses is required. In addition there is a need of creating awareness regarding harmful effects of noise pollution and rules and regulations meant for controlling the noise pollution in the community. The influential people including priests should also be included in IEC activities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

References:

1.      Central Pollution Control Board(CPCB).”Ambient Noise Level Status In Delhi During 1995 and 1999”. Control of Urban Pollution. OPS/51/2000-01 Jan, 2001

2.      Central Pollution Control Board(CPCB). “Noise Pollution Regulations In India” June, 2001 

3.      Central Pollution Control Board(CPCB). “Parivesh-Newsletter on Noise Pollution” .December 1996 .Vol. 3(iv)

4.      Khan A.B. “The impact of Noise Pollution on Community Health: A study at Pondicherry”. Biomedicine, 18(3):183-190,1998.

5.      Bhattacharya S K, Roy A , Tripathi S R and Chatterjee B K. “Behavioural measurement in textile weavers wearing ear protectors”. IJMR. 1985: 82:56-58

 

Table: Distribution of Urban Population in Maharashtra and Karnataka by Size Class 1971-2001

 

 

Class I

Class II

Class III

Class IV

Class V

Class VI

All Class

1971

Maharashtra

11102235

1160316

1663295

1310822

427706

46837

15711211

Karnataka

3655006

652937

1071955

1331368

323066

87761

7122093

1981

Maharashtra

16553036

1306226

2410937

1330620

338023

54752

21993594

Karnataka

6320436

750580

1873346

1435857

290703

58684

10729606

1991

Maharashtra

23770141

1979229

3173588

1265958

314213

38457

30541586

Karnataka

9005462

1018397

2453779

1070901

282547

76701

13907788

2001

Maharashtra

32693338

2731121

3864073

1358483

343435

29284

41019734

Karnataka

12043036

1726134

3096525

839021

192477

22665

17919858

 

Source:Provisional Population Totals,Rural-Urban Distribution of Population,Paper–2 of 2001,Series 30 Karnataka,Census of India 2001.Table 7 –Growth of Urban Population 1971-2001.

               Provisional Population Totals,Rural-Urban Distribution of Population,Paper–2 of 2001,Series 28 Maharashtra,Census of India 2001.Statement S4 Distribution of Urban Population by Size Class..

 

Class I   -------   100,000 and above (generally referred as city)

Class II  -------   50,000 to 99,999

Class III -------  20,000 to 49,999

Class IV -------  10,000 to 19,000

Class V  -------   5,000 to 9,999

Class VI -------  less than 5,000